mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Mouse Ceacam1 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody/product/R&D Systems
Average 91 stars, based on 6 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "SOX10 requirement for melanoma tumor growth is due, in part, to immune-mediated effects"
Article Title: SOX10 requirement for melanoma tumor growth is due, in part, to immune-mediated effects
Journal: Cell reports
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110085
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ , and HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified. (B) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (C) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (D) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (E) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones. The arrow indicates a nonspecific band ("n.s."). (F) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones. All data in this figure represent 3 biological replicates; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Knock-Out, Clone Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Fluorescence, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of HVEM ( TNFRSF14 ) was plotted versus SOX10 expression ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (B) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of CEACAM1 was plotted versus SOX10 express ion ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (C) Single-cell RNA-seq data of malignant cells were visualized by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plots by using the Single Cell portal ( https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell ), whereby each cluster represents a distinct melanoma tumor and each circle represents an individual cell.
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Variant Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) HVEM was expressed in YUMM1.1 parental and CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells by lentiviral transduction. HVEM expression was validated by flow cytometry staining. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (B) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells, or HVEM-overexpressing cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by digital caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 7 mice per group. (C) Related to (B), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 . (D) Two individual clones were generated from CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of Ceacam1 in YUMM1.1 cells. CEACAM1 surface expression was evaluated by flow cytometry. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (E) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.8, or CR. #1.30 Ceacam1 knockout cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 10 mice per group. (F) Related to (E), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 .**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Knock-Out, Transduction, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Control, Injection, Clone Assay, Generated, CRISPR
Figure Legend Snippet:
Techniques Used: Control, Recombinant, CRISPR, Knockdown, Western Blot, Generated, Software
