Review



mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 91

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody
    (A) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ , and HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified. (B) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (C) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . <t>CEACAM1</t> expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (D) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (E) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones. The arrow indicates a nonspecific band (
    Mouse Ceacam1 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody/product/R&D Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 6 article reviews
    mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    91/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "SOX10 requirement for melanoma tumor growth is due, in part, to immune-mediated effects"

    Article Title: SOX10 requirement for melanoma tumor growth is due, in part, to immune-mediated effects

    Journal: Cell reports

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110085

    (A) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ , and HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified. (B) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (C) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (D) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (E) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones. The arrow indicates a nonspecific band (
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ , and HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified. (B) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (C) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (D) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (E) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones. The arrow indicates a nonspecific band ("n.s."). (F) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones. All data in this figure represent 3 biological replicates; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Knock-Out, Clone Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Fluorescence, Western Blot

    (A) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of HVEM ( TNFRSF14 ) was plotted versus SOX10 expression ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (B) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of CEACAM1 was plotted versus SOX10 express ion ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (C) Single-cell RNA-seq data of malignant cells were visualized by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plots by using the Single Cell portal ( https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell ), whereby each cluster represents a distinct melanoma tumor and each circle represents an individual cell.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of HVEM ( TNFRSF14 ) was plotted versus SOX10 expression ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (B) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of CEACAM1 was plotted versus SOX10 express ion ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (C) Single-cell RNA-seq data of malignant cells were visualized by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plots by using the Single Cell portal ( https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell ), whereby each cluster represents a distinct melanoma tumor and each circle represents an individual cell.

    Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Variant Assay

    (A) HVEM was expressed in YUMM1.1 parental and CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells by lentiviral transduction. HVEM expression was validated by flow cytometry staining. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (B) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells, or HVEM-overexpressing cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by digital caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 7 mice per group. (C) Related to (B), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 . (D) Two individual clones were generated from CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of Ceacam1 in YUMM1.1 cells. CEACAM1 surface expression was evaluated by flow cytometry. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (E) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.8, or CR. #1.30 Ceacam1 knockout cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 10 mice per group. (F) Related to (E), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 .**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) HVEM was expressed in YUMM1.1 parental and CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells by lentiviral transduction. HVEM expression was validated by flow cytometry staining. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (B) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells, or HVEM-overexpressing cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by digital caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 7 mice per group. (C) Related to (B), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 . (D) Two individual clones were generated from CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of Ceacam1 in YUMM1.1 cells. CEACAM1 surface expression was evaluated by flow cytometry. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (E) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.8, or CR. #1.30 Ceacam1 knockout cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 10 mice per group. (F) Related to (E), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 .**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Knock-Out, Transduction, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Control, Injection, Clone Assay, Generated, CRISPR


    Figure Legend Snippet:

    Techniques Used: Control, Recombinant, CRISPR, Knockdown, Western Blot, Generated, Software



    Similar Products

    91
    R&D Systems mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody
    (A) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ , and HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified. (B) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (C) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . <t>CEACAM1</t> expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (D) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (E) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones. The arrow indicates a nonspecific band (
    Mouse Ceacam1 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody/product/R&D Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse ceacam1 polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Jackson Immuno custom made mouse ab3759 polyclonal antibody against ceacam1
    Fig. 1. Tissue-specific expression of mouse <t>CEACAM1</t> (mCC1). (A) Primary hepatocytes from Alb–Cc1+/+ (white bar), Alb+Cc1+/+ (light grey bar), Alb–Cc1fl/fl(dark grey bar) and Alb+Cc1fl/fl(black bar) were isolated and analyzed by qRT-PCR in triplicate to assess mouse Ceacam1 mRNA level. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P b 0.05 vs Alb– Cc1+/+, Alb+Cc1+/+ and Alb–Cc1fl/fl. (B) Western blot analysis of mouse (mCC1) CEACAM1 protein content in (i) liver and kidney, and (ii) hypothalamus and heart was performed by immunoblotting (Ib) the upper portion of the blot with a polyclonal antibody against CEACAM1 (α-CC1) and the lower portion with α-Tubulin to normalize for protein loading. Gels represent more than two experiments (different mice/genotype).
    Custom Made Mouse Ab3759 Polyclonal Antibody Against Ceacam1, supplied by Jackson Immuno, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/custom made mouse ab3759 polyclonal antibody against ceacam1/product/Jackson Immuno
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    custom made mouse ab3759 polyclonal antibody against ceacam1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc polyclonal antibodies against mouse ceacam1 (α-mcc1 ab3759)
    Fig. 1. Tissue-specific expression of mouse <t>CEACAM1</t> (mCC1). (A) Primary hepatocytes from Alb–Cc1+/+ (white bar), Alb+Cc1+/+ (light grey bar), Alb–Cc1fl/fl(dark grey bar) and Alb+Cc1fl/fl(black bar) were isolated and analyzed by qRT-PCR in triplicate to assess mouse Ceacam1 mRNA level. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P b 0.05 vs Alb– Cc1+/+, Alb+Cc1+/+ and Alb–Cc1fl/fl. (B) Western blot analysis of mouse (mCC1) CEACAM1 protein content in (i) liver and kidney, and (ii) hypothalamus and heart was performed by immunoblotting (Ib) the upper portion of the blot with a polyclonal antibody against CEACAM1 (α-CC1) and the lower portion with α-Tubulin to normalize for protein loading. Gels represent more than two experiments (different mice/genotype).
    Polyclonal Antibodies Against Mouse Ceacam1 (α Mcc1 Ab3759), supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/polyclonal antibodies against mouse ceacam1 (α-mcc1 ab3759)/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    polyclonal antibodies against mouse ceacam1 (α-mcc1 ab3759) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ , and HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified. (B) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (C) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (D) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (E) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones. The arrow indicates a nonspecific band (

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: SOX10 requirement for melanoma tumor growth is due, in part, to immune-mediated effects

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110085

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ , and HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified. (B) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . HVEM expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (C) Parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (D) Parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones were treated with or without 100 ng/mL IFN γ . CEACAM1 expression was probed by flow cytometry staining, and MFI was quantified. (E) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental mouse melanoma YUMM1.1 cells and Sox10 knockout clones. The arrow indicates a nonspecific band ("n.s."). (F) CEACAM1 expression was probed by western blot in parental human melanoma MeWo cells and SOX10 knockout clones. All data in this figure represent 3 biological replicates; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse CEACAM1 polyclonal antibody (#AF6480) was purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Clone Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Fluorescence, Western Blot

    (A) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of HVEM ( TNFRSF14 ) was plotted versus SOX10 expression ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (B) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of CEACAM1 was plotted versus SOX10 express ion ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (C) Single-cell RNA-seq data of malignant cells were visualized by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plots by using the Single Cell portal ( https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell ), whereby each cluster represents a distinct melanoma tumor and each circle represents an individual cell.

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: SOX10 requirement for melanoma tumor growth is due, in part, to immune-mediated effects

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110085

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of HVEM ( TNFRSF14 ) was plotted versus SOX10 expression ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (B) RNA-seq from the melanoma TCGA dataset was visualized using cBioportal, and the mRNA expression level of CEACAM1 was plotted versus SOX10 express ion ( ; ). Shown are values batch normalized from Illumina HiSeq_RNASeqV2. SOX10 mutation type, structural variant, and copy number are indicated for each sample. (C) Single-cell RNA-seq data of malignant cells were visualized by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plots by using the Single Cell portal ( https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell ), whereby each cluster represents a distinct melanoma tumor and each circle represents an individual cell.

    Article Snippet: Mouse CEACAM1 polyclonal antibody (#AF6480) was purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Variant Assay

    (A) HVEM was expressed in YUMM1.1 parental and CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells by lentiviral transduction. HVEM expression was validated by flow cytometry staining. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (B) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells, or HVEM-overexpressing cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by digital caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 7 mice per group. (C) Related to (B), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 . (D) Two individual clones were generated from CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of Ceacam1 in YUMM1.1 cells. CEACAM1 surface expression was evaluated by flow cytometry. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (E) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.8, or CR. #1.30 Ceacam1 knockout cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 10 mice per group. (F) Related to (E), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 .**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: SOX10 requirement for melanoma tumor growth is due, in part, to immune-mediated effects

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110085

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) HVEM was expressed in YUMM1.1 parental and CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells by lentiviral transduction. HVEM expression was validated by flow cytometry staining. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (B) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.41 Sox10 knockout cells, or HVEM-overexpressing cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by digital caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 7 mice per group. (C) Related to (B), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 . (D) Two individual clones were generated from CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of Ceacam1 in YUMM1.1 cells. CEACAM1 surface expression was evaluated by flow cytometry. Data are representative of 3 biological replicates. An unstained control is shown in light gray. (E) YUMM1.1 parental, CR. #1.8, or CR. #1.30 Ceacam1 knockout cells were injected into BL6 mice, and tumors were measured by caliper every 2–3 days. Data were collected from 10 mice per group. (F) Related to (E), time-to-tumor onset was tracked. Tumors were considered fully formed when they reached ~50 mm 3 .**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse CEACAM1 polyclonal antibody (#AF6480) was purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Transduction, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Control, Injection, Clone Assay, Generated, CRISPR

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: SOX10 requirement for melanoma tumor growth is due, in part, to immune-mediated effects

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110085

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Mouse CEACAM1 polyclonal antibody (#AF6480) was purchased from R&D Systems.

    Techniques: Control, Recombinant, CRISPR, Knockdown, Western Blot, Generated, Software

    Fig. 1. Tissue-specific expression of mouse CEACAM1 (mCC1). (A) Primary hepatocytes from Alb–Cc1+/+ (white bar), Alb+Cc1+/+ (light grey bar), Alb–Cc1fl/fl(dark grey bar) and Alb+Cc1fl/fl(black bar) were isolated and analyzed by qRT-PCR in triplicate to assess mouse Ceacam1 mRNA level. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P b 0.05 vs Alb– Cc1+/+, Alb+Cc1+/+ and Alb–Cc1fl/fl. (B) Western blot analysis of mouse (mCC1) CEACAM1 protein content in (i) liver and kidney, and (ii) hypothalamus and heart was performed by immunoblotting (Ib) the upper portion of the blot with a polyclonal antibody against CEACAM1 (α-CC1) and the lower portion with α-Tubulin to normalize for protein loading. Gels represent more than two experiments (different mice/genotype).

    Journal: Metabolism: clinical and experimental

    Article Title: Hyperinsulinemia drives hepatic insulin resistance in male mice with liver-specific Ceacam1 deletion independently of lipolysis.

    doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.01.008

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1. Tissue-specific expression of mouse CEACAM1 (mCC1). (A) Primary hepatocytes from Alb–Cc1+/+ (white bar), Alb+Cc1+/+ (light grey bar), Alb–Cc1fl/fl(dark grey bar) and Alb+Cc1fl/fl(black bar) were isolated and analyzed by qRT-PCR in triplicate to assess mouse Ceacam1 mRNA level. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P b 0.05 vs Alb– Cc1+/+, Alb+Cc1+/+ and Alb–Cc1fl/fl. (B) Western blot analysis of mouse (mCC1) CEACAM1 protein content in (i) liver and kidney, and (ii) hypothalamus and heart was performed by immunoblotting (Ib) the upper portion of the blot with a polyclonal antibody against CEACAM1 (α-CC1) and the lower portion with α-Tubulin to normalize for protein loading. Gels represent more than two experiments (different mice/genotype).

    Article Snippet: Cells were lysed in 1%Triton-X and proteins immunoprecipitated with streptavidin (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and immunoblotted with 1:1000 of insulin receptor alpha (IRα) antibody (N-20, Santa Cruz) or a custom-made mouse Ab3759 polyclonal antibody against CEACAM1 [20], followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated mouse anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia, Sunnyvale, CA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Isolation, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot

    Fig. 8. Hyperphagia and systemic insulin resistance. (A) Pair-feeding experiments were performed on 7–8 month-old mice with some (i) Alb+Cc1fl/flbeing fed ad libitum (AL) and others being subjected to caloric restriction (CR) for 2 weeks to decrease their body mass to the level of Ad libitum fed controls (n = 6/genotype/feeding group). (ii) At the end of the feeding period insulin tolerance was determined. (AL)Alb–Cc1+/+ (white circle), (AL)Alb+Cc1+/+ (light grey triangle), (AL)Alb–Cc1fl/fl(dark grey square), (AL)Alb +Cc1fl/fl(black circle) and (CR)Alb+Cc1fl/fl(hatched circle). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM at each time point. *P b 0.05 vs (AL)Alb–Cc1+/+, (AL)Alb+Cc1+/+, (AL) Alb–Cc1fl/fland (CR)Alb+Cc1fl/fl. (B) Ceacam1 (Cc1) mRNA content was analyzed by qRT- PCR in triplicate in liver (i) and hypothalamus (ii) of Alb–Cc1fl/fl(grey bar) and Alb +Cc1fl/fl(black bar) mice aged 2–9 months (n = 5/genotype/age group). (iii) Cc2 mRNA was analyzed in the hypothalamus of Alb–Cc1fl/fl(grey bar) and Alb+Cc1fl/fl(black bar) mice aged 2–9 months, as in (ii). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P b 0.05 vs Alb– Cc1fl/flof the same age group. †P ≤0.05 vs mice at the earliest age examined.

    Journal: Metabolism: clinical and experimental

    Article Title: Hyperinsulinemia drives hepatic insulin resistance in male mice with liver-specific Ceacam1 deletion independently of lipolysis.

    doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.01.008

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 8. Hyperphagia and systemic insulin resistance. (A) Pair-feeding experiments were performed on 7–8 month-old mice with some (i) Alb+Cc1fl/flbeing fed ad libitum (AL) and others being subjected to caloric restriction (CR) for 2 weeks to decrease their body mass to the level of Ad libitum fed controls (n = 6/genotype/feeding group). (ii) At the end of the feeding period insulin tolerance was determined. (AL)Alb–Cc1+/+ (white circle), (AL)Alb+Cc1+/+ (light grey triangle), (AL)Alb–Cc1fl/fl(dark grey square), (AL)Alb +Cc1fl/fl(black circle) and (CR)Alb+Cc1fl/fl(hatched circle). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM at each time point. *P b 0.05 vs (AL)Alb–Cc1+/+, (AL)Alb+Cc1+/+, (AL) Alb–Cc1fl/fland (CR)Alb+Cc1fl/fl. (B) Ceacam1 (Cc1) mRNA content was analyzed by qRT- PCR in triplicate in liver (i) and hypothalamus (ii) of Alb–Cc1fl/fl(grey bar) and Alb +Cc1fl/fl(black bar) mice aged 2–9 months (n = 5/genotype/age group). (iii) Cc2 mRNA was analyzed in the hypothalamus of Alb–Cc1fl/fl(grey bar) and Alb+Cc1fl/fl(black bar) mice aged 2–9 months, as in (ii). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P b 0.05 vs Alb– Cc1fl/flof the same age group. †P ≤0.05 vs mice at the earliest age examined.

    Article Snippet: Cells were lysed in 1%Triton-X and proteins immunoprecipitated with streptavidin (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and immunoblotted with 1:1000 of insulin receptor alpha (IRα) antibody (N-20, Santa Cruz) or a custom-made mouse Ab3759 polyclonal antibody against CEACAM1 [20], followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated mouse anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia, Sunnyvale, CA).

    Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR